Nicole Kennedy, Author at Spinwell Global - Page 2 of 2

Spinwell Global

Interesting Jobs for Interesting People

UK Cybersecurity & Digital Skills: Now a Board-Level Problem

The UK cybersecurity and digital skills shortage is now a board-level problem

Demand for cybersecurity, AI and cloud professionals is outpacing supply at a rate not seen before. Here is what that means if you are hiring, and if you are one of those specialists.

Spinwell Global   ·   5 min read   ·   Public Sector and Technology Recruitment

Something shifted in the last 12 months. Cybersecurity and digital transformation used to sit in the IT department. They were technical concerns, managed by technical people, reported upward occasionally when something went wrong.

That is no longer the case. In 2026, demand for specialists in AI, cybersecurity and cloud engineering has reached board level, and the supply of people who can actually do this work has not come close to keeping pace.

If you are a hiring manager trying to fill one of these roles, you already know this. If you are a specialist in one of these disciplines, you may not yet realise how significant your value has become.

This piece is for both of you.

49% of UK businesses have a basic cybersecurity skills gap

12,900 cybersecurity roles needed to be filled in 2025 alone

30% of UK businesses report gaps in advanced technical cyber skills

Source: Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), Cyber Security Skills in the UK Labour Market 2025

What the data actually says

The figures behind this shortage come directly from government research. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) publishes an annual Cyber Security Skills in the UK Labour Market report, and the 2025 findings are unambiguous.

Nearly half of all UK businesses (49%) have a basic cybersecurity skills gap. A further 30% report shortfalls in more advanced technical areas including penetration testing and forensic analysis. An estimated 12,900 cybersecurity roles needed filling in 2025, representing an 11% increase on the previous year.

Separately, Firebrand Training’s 2026 survey of senior UK leaders found that nearly half of organisations openly acknowledge high-level gaps in cybersecurity knowledge and skills, with the most acute shortfalls in risk controls, information security, incident response and infrastructure security. These are not entry-level deficits. They sit at the intersection of architecture, governance and hands-on technical response, where experienced practitioners are hardest to find and retain.

The SANS Institute 2026 Cybersecurity Workforce Research Report adds further weight: 27% of organisations directly link recent security breaches to workforce capability gaps. Teams may exist on paper, yet they often lack the specialised skills required to defend against sophisticated modern threats.

These are not small, incremental changes. This is a structural shift.

Why cybersecurity has moved to the boardroom

The shift began with the scale and cost of breaches. Ransomware attacks, data theft and infrastructure disruption have become mainstream business risks, ones that boards can no longer delegate entirely to a technical team.

Regulatory pressure has compounded this. Organisations operating across UK government, financial services and critical national infrastructure now face mandatory security standards that carry real consequences for non-compliance. The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, introduced to Parliament in November 2025, signals the direction of travel clearly. A security failure is no longer just a reputational problem. It is a contractual and legal one.

The result is that demand for cybersecurity professionals, analysts, architects, engineers and transformation leads, is being driven not just by IT departments but by risk committees, audit functions and chief executives. The buying decision has moved up the organisation. The urgency has moved with it.

“There are candidates. There are not enough of the right ones.”

What this means if you are a hiring manager

The most important thing to understand is that the market for these specialists does not behave like a normal recruitment market. Speed matters more than almost anything else.

A strong cybersecurity architect or senior cloud engineer is not browsing job boards waiting for the right opportunity. They are being approached regularly, often by multiple organisations simultaneously. The window between a candidate being genuinely available and being committed elsewhere can be extremely short.

What this means in practice:

  1. Your process needs to move faster than you are used to. Two stages, not four. Feedback within 24 hours. A decision-maker who can move without a committee.
  2. Your job description needs to be specific and honest. Vague specifications attract vague applications. In a market where you are competing for scarce talent, a well-written brief is a competitive advantage, not an administrative task.
  3. Your rate or salary needs to reflect the market today, not what you paid two years ago. Cybersecurity and cloud specialists have seen significant rate increases. Organisations benchmarking against outdated data are losing candidates before the first conversation ends.
  4. Contract hiring deserves serious consideration. In a tight permanent market, a skilled contractor can be deployed rapidly, particularly for transformation programmes, cloud migrations or urgent cyber remediation. Contract resource gives you access to expertise without long-term headcount commitment.

What this means if you are a specialist

If you work in cybersecurity, AI, cloud engineering, data architecture or digital transformation, the market in 2026 is significantly in your favour. Demand is structural, not cyclical, meaning it is unlikely to soften in the near term.

A few things worth knowing:

Your skills are transferable across sectors in a way that many specialist roles are not. A strong cloud security engineer is needed in financial services, central government, defence and the NHS simultaneously. You are not restricted to one vertical.

Security clearance significantly increases your value. SC and DV cleared professionals are among the hardest to find and fastest to place in the current market. If you hold clearance and are not actively managing your career with that in mind, you are leaving options on the table.

Contract rates for cleared, specialist professionals have increased materially. If you have not reviewed your rate in the last 12 months, it is worth doing.

The best opportunities in this market are rarely advertised publicly. Organisations with urgent, sensitive or specialist requirements go to trusted suppliers first. Being known to the right recruiter, one who specialises in your sector rather than covers it broadly, is how you access roles that never reach a job board.

The Spinwell perspective

We place cleared and specialist professionals across digital, technology, risk and security, predominantly into public sector and government programmes. We are an approved supplier on the Digital Outcomes and Specialists 7 (DOS7) framework through the Government Commercial Agency (GCA).

What we see daily is consistent with what the data says. The roles that are hardest to fill are not the ones with the most unusual requirements. They are the ones where the hiring process has not caught up with the pace of the market.

And the candidates who are hardest to reach are not the ones who are not looking. They are the ones who are looking quietly, for the right thing, through people they already trust.

The question worth asking now

The UK digital and cyber skills shortage is not a temporary gap waiting to close. It is a structural feature of the market for the foreseeable future. The organisations and candidates who navigate it well will be the ones who move with the right information, at the right pace, through the right channels.

If you are hiring in this space, or if you are a specialist thinking about your next move, we are worth a conversation.

About Spinwell Global

Spinwell Global is a specialist recruitment consultancy with deep expertise across digital, technology, risk and security. We are an approved supplier on the Digital Outcomes and Specialists 7 (DOS7) framework through the Government Commercial Agency (GCA), working with public and private sector clients across the UK and internationally. If you are working on a time-sensitive hire, or a specialist thinking about your next move, speak to our team.

Get in touch with us

NK

 

Sources

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT). Cyber Security Skills in the UK Labour Market 2025. Published September 2025.
Firebrand Training. Closing the UK Cybersecurity Skills Gap in 2026. Published February 2026.
SANS Institute. 2026 Cybersecurity Workforce Research Report.
DSIT / Ipsos and Perspective Economics. UK Cyber Security Sectoral Analysis 2026. Published May 2026.
HM Government. Cyber Security and Resilience Bill. Introduced to Parliament November 2025.

What Slow Hiring is Actually Costing Your Project

What Slow Hiring is Actually Costing Your Project

Most organisations know a vacancy slows things down. What’s less often calculated is exactly how much — and where the damage really shows up.

There’s a number most project managers never see on a risk register. It’s not the cost of a data breach, or a failed sprint, or even a contractor walking off mid-engagement. It’s the compounding, invisible cost of a vacancy that sits open for three, four, or six weeks while the hiring process moves at its own pace.

The vacancy isn’t the problem — the untracked drag that comes with it is. And by the time most clients formally acknowledge the cost, the project is already behind.

£1,200 – Estimated daily cost of a vacant mid-level tech role (productivity loss)

38 days – Average time-to-hire for specialist roles in the UK public sector

67% – Of projects report scope reduction when key hires are delayed by 4+ weeks

Where the cost actually hides

It’s rarely just about lost output. When a specialist role sits unfilled, the damage appears in three places that rarely show up on a traditional risk register — and each one compounds the others.

  1. Existing team overload

When a gap isn’t filled, work doesn’t disappear. It redistributes. The most capable people on your team — often your most senior — absorb the extra load because they’re the ones who can. Their own priorities slip. Decisions slow down. And because this redistribution happens quietly, there’s rarely a formal record of the cost.

The longer the vacancy, the more normalised the overload becomes. People stop flagging it. They work longer hours and call it temporary. By the time the hire is made, the team may be months into a pattern that’s difficult to unwind.

  1. Milestone creep

Delivery dates move, often quietly and often incrementally. A two-week delay here, a sprint extension there. No single event looks  catastrophic enough to escalate. But when you look back across a project, slow hiring at a critical juncture is frequently the thread that unravels a timeline.

This is particularly acute in public sector projects, where delivery milestones are often contractually tied. A delayed hire doesn’t just slow a sprint — it can put formal programme commitments at risk.

  1. Candidate drop-off

The best contractors and specialists have options. A process that takes five or six weeks doesn’t just feel slow — it communicates something to the candidate about how the organisation operates. The strongest applicants accept offers elsewhere. You restart from scratch with second-choice candidates, often under more pressure and with less leverage.

This isn’t hypothetical. In a tight specialist market — cleared security professionals, senior digital architects, niche data engineers — the window between a candidate being available and being committed elsewhere can be as short as 72 hours.

“The vacancy isn’t the problem — the untracked drag that comes with it is. By the time most clients realise the cost, the project is already behind.”

Why hiring processes slow down

The causes of slow hiring are well-known but rarely fixed. They tend to cluster around three structural problems:

  1. A brief that’s written during the search, not before it — leading to scope creep and changing requirements mid-process
  2. Interview stages that multiply over time, each requiring coordination across diaries and stakeholders
  3. Decision-making that’s distributed across too many people, none of whom have the authority — or appetite — to move fast

Each of these problems is solvable. None of them require a wholesale overhaul of how your organisation hires. But they do require someone to name them clearly and own the fix.

What good actually looks like

Organisations that consistently fill specialist roles quickly share a few common practices. They’re not dramatic. But they’re consistently absent in the organisations that struggle.

  1. The brief is agreed before the search begins — scope, must-haves, nice-to-haves, and the decision criteria are locked before a single CV is reviewed
  2. The process has two stages maximum — a screening call and a technical or stakeholder interview. Not three stages. Not four.
  3. A single named decision-maker has authority to make an offer — not a committee, not a group email chain, not approval from someone on annual leave
  4. Feedback is given within 24 hours of each stage — both to preserve candidate engagement and to maintain momentum internally

None of these are radical. They’re the basics. But in practice, they’re surprisingly rare.

How frameworks change the equation

One of the most significant structural fixes available to public sector organisations is procurement frameworks. A framework agreement — such as the Government Commercial Agency’s DOS7 (Digital Outcomes and Specialists 7), on which Spinwell Global is an approved supplier — removes the procurement overhead that traditionally slows down the start of a search.

The legal and compliance groundwork is already done. The commercial terms are pre-agreed. The conversation can start at capability, not contract. In practice, this alone can reduce the time from ‘role approved’ to ‘search begins’ from several weeks to a matter of days.

When you combine a framework-based engagement with a supplier who already has a deep pool of pre-screened specialists in your sector — cleared professionals, digital delivery experts, risk and security specialists — the time-to-fill compresses further still.

The question worth asking now

If you have a role open today, or one you know is coming, the most useful thing you can do isn’t to start the search. It’s to ask: what is slowing down our ability to move once a strong candidate is in front of us?

The answer is almost always process. And process is fixable — faster than most people think, with the right partner involved early enough.

Get in touch with us

NK

How to Tailor Your CV Without Rewriting It Every Time

You’ve spent hours perfecting your CV. It looks great. And now you’re staring at a job description wondering: do I have to rewrite the whole thing again?

The answer is no — but you do need to tailor it. The good news? With the right system, tailoring a CV takes 15–20 minutes, not three hours. Here’s exactly how to do it.

Why tailoring matters (and what it actually means)

Recruiters spend an average of 7 seconds scanning a CV. Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) filter out candidates before a human ever reads the document. Tailoring isn’t about flattery — it’s about signal clarity. A tailored CV says: I am the person you described in that job ad.

Tailoring does not mean:

It does mean:

The core idea: Your master CV is a full inventory of your career. Each application pulls from that inventory selectively.

Step 1: Build your master CV (once)

Before you can tailor efficiently, you need a single source of truth — a “master CV” that contains everything. Think of it as a vault you’ll never send to anyone.

Your master CV should include:

Profile summary (3–5 versions)
Write one version per type of role you pursue — e.g. “marketing manager”, “brand strategist”, “comms lead”. Label each clearly.

Work experience (all bullets)
For each role, write 6–10 achievement bullets. You’ll never use all of them — but you’ll have options to choose from.

Skills bank (tagged by category)
Group skills: technical / tools / soft / languages. Tag which are most relevant for each role type you target.

Achievements & metrics
A separate list of standout numbers, awards, and outcomes — even if they don’t appear in your bullets yet.

Step 2: Decode the job description in 5 minutes

Every job description contains hidden instructions for how your CV should read. Here’s how to extract them quickly.

Highlight repeated words
Any word used 2+ times is a priority keyword. Use it (naturally) in your summary and bullet points.

Separate “must haves” from “nice to haves”
Focus on matching the “essential” requirements — those are the ATS filters. Nice-to-haves are bonus points.

Note the implied soft skills
“Fast-paced environment” = resilience. “Cross-functional” = communication. Match their language, not yours.

Identify the 3 core outcomes they need
Ask: what does this person need to achieve in the role? Lead with evidence you can deliver exactly that.

Step 3: The 15-minute tailoring process

With your master CV open and job description decoded, here’s your process:

15-minute tailoring checklist

0–3 min Swap the profile summary
Select the right pre-written version from your master CV. Adjust 1–2 sentences to echo the specific role title and company name.

3–8 min Reorder your bullet points
Move the 3–4 bullets most relevant to the role to the top of each job entry. Delete or move weaker bullets down. No rewriting — just reordering.

8–12 min Mirror the keywords
Scan your top 3 bullet points per role for the priority keywords you found. Swap in their phrasing where it fits naturally (e.g. “led” → “managed”, if that’s the JD’s word).

12–15 min Adjust the skills section
Move skills mentioned in the JD to the top of your skills list. Remove or demote skills that aren’t relevant to this role

The profile summary formula

Your profile summary is the highest-value real estate on your CV. Here’s a fill-in-the-blank template that works across most roles:

[Job title] with [X years] of experience in [industry/specialism]. Proven track record of [key outcome 1] and [key outcome 2]. Skilled in [top 2–3 relevant skills], with particular expertise in [specific strength from JD]. Now seeking a role where I can [what the company needs / what the role offers].

Tip: write 2–3 versions of this for different role types and keep them in your master CV.

The bullet point formula that travels well

Great bullet points don’t need to be rewritten for every application — they need to be written well once. Use this structure:

The CAR formula

C – Context / Challenge
A – Action you took
R – Result (with metric)

Example: Led migration of legacy CRM to Salesforce (C) — managing a 4-person project team and stakeholder communications (A) — reducing data retrieval time by 40% and cutting manual reporting hours by 6 hrs/week (R).

CAR bullets are infinitely reorderable and swappable — making them ideal for rapid tailoring.

Common tailoring mistakes to avoid

The system in practice

Once your master CV is built and your CAR bullets are written, most tailoring is:

The time investment is front-loaded — building your master CV properly takes 1–2 hours. But every application after that? 15–20 minutes maximum.

That’s the system. A vault to pull from, a decoder to guide you, and a checklist to execute. No blank pages. No starting over.

 

Get in touch with us

NK

Imposter Syndrome in Job Hunting — And How to Beat It

You find a job listing that sounds perfect… until you read the requirements.

“5+ years of experience.”
“Expert in…”
“Proven track record of…”

Suddenly, that spark of excitement turns into doubt: Am I actually qualified for this?
Cue imposter syndrome — that nagging voice that insists you’re not as capable as people think you are.

If this sounds familiar, you’re far from alone.

Why Job Hunting Triggers Imposter Syndrome

Job searching is basically a highlight reel competition. You’re comparing your behind-the-scenes (uncertainty, gaps, learning curves) with other people’s polished LinkedIn profiles and CVs.

Add in rejection emails or silence, and it’s easy to spiral into thinking:

But here’s the reality: job descriptions are wish lists, not checklists. Most people don’t meet every requirement — they apply anyway.

Signs It’s Holding You Back

Imposter syndrome doesn’t just live in your thoughts — it shapes your behavior:

Recognising this is the first step to breaking the cycle.

How to Beat It (For Real)

1. Apply Before You Feel Ready
Confidence doesn’t come first — action does. If you meet around 60–70% of the criteria, you’re in the game.

2. Rewrite Your Inner Narrative
Instead of “I’m underqualified,” try:
“I’m capable of learning what I don’t know yet.”

It sounds simple, but it changes how you show up.

3. Keep a ‘Wins’ List
Write down projects you’ve completed, problems you’ve solved, and positive feedback you’ve received.
On bad days, this becomes your reality check.

4. Treat Rejection as Data, Not Judgment
Not hearing back isn’t proof you’re not good enough — it’s often timing, competition, or internal hiring decisions you’ll never see.

5. Talk About Your Work Like It Matters (Because It Does)
You don’t need to exaggerate — just stop minimising. Be clear about your impact.

The Truth No One Says Enough

Even the most confident candidates feel like imposters sometimes. The difference? They apply anyway.

Job hunting isn’t about proving you’re perfect — it’s about showing you’re capable, adaptable, and willing to grow.

So apply for the role. Send the message. Go to the interview.

You don’t need to feel ready.
You just need to start.

Get in touch with us

NK

« Previous Page